Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:46
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Free agent LB Germaine Pratt agrees to terms with Raiders - NBC Sports
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Seattle Mariners Injury Updates: Logan Gilbert, Bryce Miller, Luke Raley, More - Lookout Landing
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Margaret Cho: Ellen DeGeneres 'Not Nice to Me for Most of My Career' - Variety
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Turn This ChatGPT Prompt Into A Six-Figure Passive Income Stream - Forbes
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
SpaceX launches human remains, reentry capsules and more on Transporter 14 rideshare mission - Space
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.